29 July 2010

In the Midst of Rain

In the midst of rain,
Suddenly, I get up in pain,
I have a sty again,
I blink my eye in vain.

In the midst of rain,
Gushing like a train,
In swirling chain,
Water ebbs down the drain.

In the midst of rain,
Farmers toil for our grain,
The Physiocratic brain,
Considered them in the main.

In the midst of rain,
Amen! Amen!

(A thought for monsoon. The first stanza is a personal expression. In the last one and a half months I have been afflicted by a sty for six times, each one debilitating me for three-to-four days. I had earlier written on a similar problem Sleep, Leap and Beep. The second one is on nature and the third is an ode to our farmers. But for them, we would all go hungry. Jai Kissan!)

Cooking is an Art

Cooking is an art,
That can destress.
When done wth caress,
You are no less a poet.

Poetry is an expression,
That is beyond wilderness.
Words woven with finess,
Like a chef's mission.

(Cooking can be replaced with any other activity and an appropriate change can be made for chef. The inspiration for this comes from Sahid Akhtar's 'Chand Shabdon se Nehin Banti Kabita', a Hindi poem. I also consider this as an ode to womanhood and motherhood whose work in the kitchen is no less than a poet.)

13 July 2010

The Goal SPUN

Aesthetics of viewing football,
Is to find rhythm and rhyme,
Without having to run.

Sitting glued to enthrall,
The skill to squirm without stymie,
And be part of the fun.

Now, it is time for us all,
Not to grim on the grime,
But enjoy the goal SPUN.

(This is an ode to SPAIN for having won the World Cup Football championship in 2010. The inspiration for this comes from Babuji Bose's discussion on Aesthetics and Football in Adda Today forum of Facebook)

09 July 2010

Two Judgements of Bombay High Court

Two news items on 8th July 2010 with regard to different rulings by Bombay High Court has kept one thinking. Is this the system that we would like for us?

First, is the story of Adhishree Gopalakrishnan, a class nine student of Vibgyor High School in Goregaon, Mumbai. The court dismissed her petition seeking readmission to school that expelled just a day before the school reopend because her parents protested against a fee hike last year, (Find another school, court tells expelled girl). Prior to this, the school had refused to readmit the student as part of an interim arrangement. This in a sense is an outcome of the sorry state of school education in India. If you want your child to go to a good school, it has to be private. Hierarchy of schools in terms of 'quality' depend upon the paying capacity of parents.

Contrast this with the happenings in the West (including United States) that follows the neighbourhood approach. All such schools are publicly funded and do not differ much in quality. There is no question of protesting against fee hikes, as there are none. This, however, does not prevent parents and the public in general do debate with regard to curriculum, method and many other things with regard to schooling. There can be substantial differences of opinion between the school administration and parents and these are settled without the student having to suffer. As an aside, I may state that a debate in UK a few years ago was how not to conceal the identity of students who get free meals at school. A seriousness is given to school education as it is an essential part of nation building.

Second, is a judgment by its Nagpur bench indicating that 'Physical relationship based on marriage promise is not rape.' This case is between a 42 year old man and a minor. The story is that after inital rape there was consensusal relationship on the promise of marriage. However, as there was no complaint lodged by the police in the first instance, the judge observed that 'The prolonged sexual relationship, therefore, creates a strong doubt about first act too being forcible.' One fails to see why this repeated act 'consensual or otherwise' between a 42 year old man and a minor girl is not rape. This is travestry of justice.